Saturday, 30 July 2016

Astrology Compatibility - Why Sun Signs Result in Confusion

I've been a practicing astrologer for over 16 years, specializing in astrology compatibility. Getting somewhat of a technophobe, I've largely avoided the online world for much of that time. All superior items will have to come to an end on the other hand, so here I'm, now an avid on the internet reader and writer. When time permits I study and answer concerns on various connection astrology forums. Inevitably I read subjects which go like this:

I am a Leo, am I compatible with an Aquarius?

Answer 1 -- yes!

Answer 2 -- no! I'm a Leo and I dated an Aquarius. We split up.

Answer 3 -- relationship astrology is stupid. I spent 172 hours researching that every single single sun sign mixture has had divorces.

Every single of these answers is wrong, yet typically every will get persons agreeing with it. On forums exactly where votes are cast certainly one of these answer is usually selected as getting right, and filed away for future generations of query seekers. Get extra information about astrology compatibility

So what is going wrong right here?

It seems like whenever and wherever astrology compatibility is discussed on the net that there is an assumption that sun indicators would be the essential to astrology. I suspect this really is largely due to the wish to simplify, streamline and condense everything. Astrology however is really a subject exactly where simplification usually creates difficulties.

The grim reality is the fact that individuals are far more than just their sun sign, and if you want a 'real' answer to an astrology query, then you'll require a true astrology reading. Going just by sun signs is useful to acquire a rough idea of what to expect, but there are plenty of other planets which can override and trample someone's sun sign traits. Every single particular person and natal chart is special.

This has led towards the exciting predicament where in all probability 80% of all details about partnership astrology on the web is fundamentally incorrect. To qualify that metric, if sun signs could possibly be looked at inside a vacuum, then details will be appropriate. In practice (and individuals are asking such question to create real life choices, and not as a hypothetical physical exercise) it's just not that simple.

One particular fascinating side impact of this appears to become a smaller army of armchair net astrologers, handing out parcels of neat and tidy info on all aspects of sun signs. Why do they do this? Simply because the concept of key phrases imply that a potential visitor is not going to look for "Aquarius sun, Leo moon, Aries mars etc" - they're going to look for "Aquarius" - and woe betide any short article which dares to drop concentrate by going off topic with qualifications. Anything more complicated than that could bring about the browsers back button getting hit, and quite rapidly.

Fair adequate, maybe this is happening in all subjects. On the net education is clearly becoming led by the student, along with the educators are telling them what they ask, and not what they will need to understand. Search engines successfully force internet sites to meet the will need for instant gratification.

The problem for astrology is that this obsession with sun signs is degrading the credibility with the topic. People today are correct to say "hold on, I am a Leo and I don't get in addition to Sagittarius! This astrology stuff is worthless!" Are expert astrologers guilty of this too? Yes, we are. Mainly because otherwise, no one would study our articles! It could be pretty straightforward even so for astrologers to put a disclaimer or warning when answering posts or writing articles, and possibly that is the solution?

No comments:

Post a Comment